Re: For Kat: Openwatcom

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Kat wrote:

> Like i said, openwatcom != watcom, and version 3.1 was compiled with watcom,
> not openwatcom. So if i try to fix the bug in 3.1, i need watcom, because who
> knows if it will compile properly, or exibit the same behavior, with
> openwatcom?
> 
> 
> Kat

here's what looks like an old link that still works. hope it helps.

http://openwatcom.mirrors.pair.com/11.0c/

Yours, OtterDad

Don't sweat it -- it's not real life. It's only ones and zeroes. Gene Spafford

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu