Sequnce of sequence
A recent comment from CChris made me think that the position with two polls I
conducted on this list may have been misunderstood.
I conducted polls on sequence of sequence and typing/naming of sequence elements
and wrote up the results as web pages. I uploaded them to SourceFourge documents
folder which said that the administrator had to check them before release. I had
in mind that the administrator (presumably Rob) would get a message about this
automatically. I'm not sure whether this happened, and failed follow it up.
No issues about any of this, except that CChris suggested that the sequence of
sequnce proposal had been shelved because of subsequent discussions about the
appropriate syntax. I didn't understand it this way. The polls led to clear
results on certain questions, even though they are not yet implemented.
I feel that polling from time to time is a good way to resolve issues when the
community is agreed in principle but may not be able to agree unanimously on
syntax. The results should be available on the website as a guide to decisions
made but possibly not yet implemented.
If there is an administrator out there, could you check the files and open them
to the public? I have copies.
Peter Robinson
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
