OpenEuphoria

Re: For Kat: Openwatcom

• Posted by Kat <KAT12 at co?sahs?net> May 17, 2008
• 568 views

Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> 
> Kat wrote:
> >  
> > Jeremy told me in #euphoria they were at one time the same. But they aren't
> > now, as openwatcom has evolved. So they aren't the same. 
> 
> I said: "I'd say it (watcom to open watcom) hasn't changed that much, if it
> (speaking about the bug) exists in 3.1, it'll be there in 4.0 as well."

Yes, this is true. Does it contradict what i said you said? Is there some
page/email layout you'd prefer i used to denote meaning, for better
understanding, like indentation or something?

But just as "upgrading" mirc broke script, and "upgrading" (lol) windoze broke
code, and "upgrading" euphoria over the years (and win32lib, owie!) broke things,
i can't help but think that "upgrading" openwatcom over the years has also
changed how RDS's watcom built the exe.

Why is it when someone calls my code a 4-letter word for excrement on irc, i
shouldn't take it so hard,,, but anything i say that is way way short of that, or
is even a complement, or acceptance with a grain of salt, is taken so hard in
this webmail context?

Kat