Re: Euphoria Developers Group Discussion
gshingles wrote:
> c.k.lester wrote:
> > Changes to the interpreter do not require community input except when those
> > changes will introduce breaks with old code or will in some way harm the
> > current performance of Euphoria. Otherwise, it's just another feature they
> > can decide to use or not use.
> I don't agree. Sure they can decide whether to use it or not, but if it has
> been implemented in an 'unusable' (or limited/inefficient) way, that decision
> will have already been made for them.
That's why I said "those changes that will introduce breaks with old code
or will in some way harm the current performance..."
It won't be implemented in an unusable/limited/inefficient way.
> The community needs to drive the development...
This has been tried and it fails. When asked for input, only a few people
ever respond, if any. I'm saying gather those interested parties together
and leave everybody else alone.
I use PHP. I don't care about its development so I'm not part of that
developers group. I'm sure there are many Euphoria users who feel the
same about Euphoria.
But I use Euphoria and I care what happens to it, so I would want to
give my input and help guide its development.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
