OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria Developers Group Discussion

• Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at agr?culture.gou?.fr> May 16, 2008
• 1005 views

Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
> c.k.lester wrote:
> > 
> > CChris wrote:
> > 
> > > Did you notice how many improvements that would have broken zero code,
> > > because
> > > they were giving meaning to something currently illegal, were brought down
> > > because
> > > "name is not right", "one keyword more is too much" and such? A lot.
> > 
> > Such is the dynamics of design by committee. :)
> 
> Before we accept this assertion, can we have some examples of what you are
> talking
> about Chris?
> 
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
> Skype name: derek.j.parnell


- Structure field declarations
- continue, select ... case
- min, max and friends
- [] desequence operator
- sequence of <type>

an many more, didn't keep a complete tally, being tired of the repeating
pattern.

CChris