Re: Euphoria Developers Group Discussion
c.k.lester wrote:
>
> And I wonder what sort of impact and draw v4.0 will have, now with its new
> standard lib, Linux distributions, etc... Should we expect an influx of new
> users?
>
> Regardless, we need a separate developers forum.
Ok, what will we discuss on this developer forum? So far what has been discussed
on EUforum are new ideas. Should the developers on this forum just decide that
enums are a good thing and develop it w/no input from the EU community? Or
optional then/do's?
On EUforum we have not went into source level details. There have been email
conversations amongst developers w/source level details, we have not done any of
that on the forum.
I do not think that communication amongst developers is the problem with
direction for Euphoria. Direction is what we are really talking about. Not
communication amongst developers. A developers mailing list will solve the
problem of someone occasionally hitting Reply instead of Reply-to-all.
We need direction and better organization. Yes, that comes through
communication, but it's only 1 part. Now, you did recommend an organization tool
in the start, which is beneficial, if used, and it should be the focal point of
this discussion. I think we are already on SF, we should use the tools given to
us. SF is at times terribly slow, in fact, I hate using the wiki there, I
literally wait all the time for the pages to come up and it's not me, it's SF.
But, we can deal with that.
Now, back to discussion. The discussion on the forum has been flying, but we are
on the brink of a brand new release. The forum will always increase in activity
during these times. We do not want a new user coming to see Euphoria and look at
the user forum to find the last post was 3 days ago, or that there is 2 posts
today, 3 posts yesterday, the prior day no posts, etc...
--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
