OpenEuphoria

Re: sanity.ex

• Posted by Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at ?owgar?com> May 12, 2008
• 654 views

Jason Gade wrote:
> Is sanity.ex going to be replaced with unit tests, or are the unit tests
> solely
> for the standard library?

sanity.ex is still valid, however, I think unit tests are easier to maintain and
use. I have not converted anything from sanity.ex to unit tests. Unit tests does
currently test some internal functions. Eventually, I think sanity.ex should not
exist but there are too many checks in it right now to remove it.

So, did that answer the question? 

> I'm trying (slowly) to get back to helping out around here instead of just
> making
> inane comments, but the last time I messed with the code in the svn repository
> sanity.ex wasn't working due to changes in get.e I believe.
>
> Is sanity.ex working now with either 3.1.1 or with 4.0?
>

This is *great* news! Thanks! I actually just ran sanity.ex and had to make one
simple change to it (include math.e). It tells me 100% passed. So, until
sanity.ex is merged into unit testing, it wouldn't be a bad idea to run both
before committing.

Migrating sanity.ex to unit tests should be a goal before 4.0 release.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com