Re: sets for sequence.e?
- Posted by Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowg?r.?om> May 11, 2008
- 619 views
CChris wrote: > > > Done, though I may wish to add a few more unit tests. As usual, the tests > themselves > had way more problems than the code they tested. That may be but it's vital that unit tests exist, for instance, it caught quite a bit last change. One function was changed, and that function was tested with a sample app and it worked. However, all the other functions that relied upon the changed function began to fail. > There is no .htx documentation yet, but it is in sets.e and would simply need > to move from here to there with some format tags. I'm not sure I have time to > do that next week (53 entries). Really? 53 new functions? > What's best? Please put a -- TODO: document At the beginning of each function that is a global and then commit. Before functions go into SVN, they should be unit tested, however, not necessarily documented. But, we must have an easy way to see which ones are not documented. An undocumented function is one that does not exist to the public. -- Jeremy Cowgar http://jeremy.cowgar.com