Re: Current implementation of exp() is faulty.
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at ?ah?o.com> May 08, 2008
- 754 views
Oh, and just to clarify: Matt's comments come from his scientific.e library in the archive, which contains its own number parse routines that I believe are more accurate than the one built into the interpreter parser. I believe they would still suffer from conversion errors, just not as pronounced. Again, I'll have to experiment later. -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. --John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.