Re: Current implementation of exp() is faulty.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Oh, and just to clarify: Matt's comments come from his scientific.e library in
the archive, which contains its own number parse routines that I believe are more
accurate than the one built into the interpreter parser.

I believe they would still suffer from conversion errors, just not as
pronounced. Again, I'll have to experiment later.

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu