OpenEuphoria

Re: message_box() category yay or nay?

• Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at a?r?culture.gouv.fr> May 07, 2008
• 559 views

Shawn Pringle wrote:
> 
> CChris wrote:
> > 
> > I'd suggest spinning a new Interactive I/O category from the current File
> > and
> > device I/O off. There would go:
> > pronpt_number
> > mrompt_string
> > message_box
> > get_key
> > wait_key
> > ? (since it prints to stdout only)
> > and perhaps whatever should be under Mouse support currently, in which case
> > the latter category would disappear.
> > 
> > I say "should" because the link from reference index page to Mouse support
> > goes
> > to the OS category listing.
> > 
> > Also, I'd spin all crash_* entries from Machine level interface, an put that
> > under either OS or a new Runtime Control category.
> > 
> > CChris
> 
> Putting these routines in an Interactive category allows us to discover these
> functions.  I didn't know about those other routines.  That's why I never
> used them.
> 
> 
> Shawn Pringle

I forgot to mention that fre_console() is misplaced under C Interface. I'd put
it in Interactive I/O as well, although OS is a reasonable choice too.

CChris