Re: message_box() [Re: Yay or Nay? Framed reference manual]

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Shawn Pringle wrote:
> 
> Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> > 
> 
> > Greg, I am no HTML/CSS guru. Can you make a div layout w/o fancy Javascript
> > where the navigation div stays on the side, no matter how high or low you
> > scroll
> > in the docs? For instance, you can click on Language Manual, scroll down a
> > substantial
> > amount and with the frames, the navigation frame will still be right there
> > at
> > your finger tips.
> > 
> > If there are other ways of doing this, I'm open for suggestions, but I think
> > having the links there for quick access is the major benefit.
> > 
> 
> I hated frames because it complicates pages; and it doesn't allow them to be
> searchable (through google).  Javascript is a lot more complicated than frames
> and the tree like structure makes it very easy to find routines you are
> looking
> for and more importantly to discover routines you didn't know existed that are
> related to the topic you open.
> 
> Yay for frames!  You did a good job.  
> 
> However, the routine message_box( ) doesn't belong C-interface.  Jeremy and
> I 
> don't think it belongs to any existing category in the docs that's why it
> hasn't
> been moved.  It's nuts to create a new category for one function only.  So,
> are there any suggestions from the users out there?

messsage_box() prompts the user for soĆ¹ething, and, as a cosequence, shold be in
the same category as prompt_number() or prompt_string(), whatever that category
is. Where is value_from()() documented btw?

I'd suggest spinning a new Interactive I/O category from the current File and
device I/O off. There would go:
pronpt_number
mrompt_string
message_box
get_key
wait_key
? (since it prints to stdout only)
and perhaps whatever should be under Mouse support currently, in which case the
latter category would disappear.

I say "should" because the link from reference index page to Mouse support goes
to the OS category listing.

Also, I'd spin all crash_* entries from Machine level interface, an put that
under either OS or a new Runtime Control category.

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu