OpenEuphoria

RE: BLISS

• Posted by jordah ferguson <jorfergie03 at yahoo.com> Jul 18, 2002
• 357 views

Hi Karl,

I have had problems trying to get BLISS to work on MY PC, win98 SE. i 
downloaded the iup
library and tried it failed. i then checked one of the examples and 
found out the lib was pointing to a dll found on e:\. anyway i corrected 
this and bliss still crashed.
	I decided to make a small basic win32lib program, that didn't do the 
trick, I went on to create an API app, Still nothing. so i'm just 
puzzled as to what i have
to do to make bliss work.
This is all i get.

BLISS caused an invalid page fault in
module BLISS.EXE at 015f:0041737e.
Registers:
EAX=00000000 CS=015f EIP=0041737e EFLGS=00010202
EBX=00428f44 SS=0167 ESP=0057fa60 EBP=0059d550
ECX=0059d550 DS=0167 ESI=00000000 FS=21ef
EDX=00428f80 ES=0167 EDI=0057fa64 GS=0000
Bytes at CS:EIP:
8a 06 88 07 3c 00 74 10 8a 46 01 83 c6 02 88 47 
Stack dump:
0057fa64 0042fa10 0041750d 755c3a63 70697a6e 00000000 81a414d4 00000200 
00000000 0057fb05 77650000 bff7a500 00000001 0057fb49 00010221 0057fad0 

jordah
ps. If what i read in the docos is so, then i'm really interested in the 
addition of structures and dot notation. its a shame we cannot bind.

kbochert at ix.netcom.com wrote:
> -------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998-
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
> 
> Hi jordah ferguson, you wrote on 7/10/02 4:52:01 AM:
> 
> >
> >i have had trouble with BLISS examples. i downloaded the dll just as you
> >said in your instructions and loaded carefully the way u said.
> >
> >i now get windows errors. saying the program caused an invalid...@##@$
> >whatever. i know i haven;t given enuff info of what is going on. i'll
> >keep you informed meaN while repeat the instructions for getting the
> >examples to work. i use win98 SE
> >
> >jordah
> 
> I also am using Win98 SE. As an experiment I just downloaded the bliss
> package and extracted it into a temporary directory. I drag & dropped
> hello.bls onto bliss.exe and it worked perfectly.
> 
> There is one small anomaly that worries me. The released version was
> compiled with Watcom and it puts up a box with a white background.
> The LCC compiled version puts up a box with the default (sort of
> putty colored) background.
> 
>  The interpreters role is just to correctly call the DLL, so
>  I'm at a loss to explain this difference and the folks
> at IUP have yet to respond.
> 
> More details may be helpful.
> 
> Karl Bochert
> 
> 
> -------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998---
>