Re: find if any memers of a set are in another set (blank line finder)?
- Posted by Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> Jul 18, 2002
- 412 views
I haven't tested this yet against text read in from a file, but it seems like it *might* work, does anyone have any thing better/faster? When I put a tab in sequence "a" below, it didn't like that, but I think a tab in a file might be different? Dan Moyer <code begins> sequence a, b a = " " b = "this is a line of text!" function IsBlankLine(sequence aLine) sequence w,x w = aLine x = w w = w > 32 -- catches any characters *less* than 33 x = w < 126 -- catches any characters more than 126 w = w and x if find(1,w) then return 0 -- no, is *not* blank line else return 1 -- yes, is blank line end if end function if IsBlankLine(a) = 1 then puts(1, "yes, \"" & a & "\" is a blank line") else puts(1, "no, \"" & a & "\" is not a blank line") end if puts(1, "\n") if IsBlankLine(b) = 1 then puts(1, "yes, \"" & b & "\" is a blank line") else puts(1, "no, \"" & b & "\" is not a blank line") end if <code ends> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Moyer" <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 5:19 AM Subject: find if any memers of a set are in another set (blank line finder)? > > I want to be able to discern whether a sequence (a line of text) is "empty" > (ie, has *only* spaces or tabs or CR or any combination of those), or if it > has *any* alpha/num/punctuation content at all. In other words,a "blank" > line finder. And it needs to function as quickly as possible. > > I thought there might be a spiffy way similar to how: > > w = {1, 2, 3} = {1, 2, 4} gives: w={1,1,0} > > and then I could make a sequence of the numbers 33-126 (for all the > al/num/punc), and test any line against that sequence with an "or" in place > of the "="; but as a test, > > w = {1, 2, 3} or {1, 2, 4} gives me: w= {1,1,1}, which I don't understand. > (I'm thinking it means that neither 3 nor 4 are zero.) > > So, is there some way to find if any member of a given set is found in > another set, or some different, good (fast) way to find "blank" lines? > > Dan Moyer > > > >