RE: Derek's Structure Library
Derek Parnell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> that's interesting. I never considered that the definition of a
> structure
> would be a transient thing. Guess there's no end to human ingenuity, eh.
>
I'm basically using the structures as temporary tables when working with
an SQL database. I query the database, and it returns the number of
columns and field names in the result set. So I create a structure on
the fly using the field names, and store the returned rows as instances
of that newly created structure. Now I can refer to the columns by name
with any result set using the same code.
But my program will be working in a loop with lots of different result
sets, and there is no need to keep the old definitions around when I'm
done with a particular set.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
