Re: about complex data type
Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
>
> In direct regards to the datetime type, it may also be nice to further the
> existing
> type check to include checks for month >= 1 and <= 12, day >= 1 and day
> <= 31, etc... So, each element would need to be checked anyway.
>
> Right now it does not do those checks, but if necessary, it could in it's
> current form.
Yes, it should validate its data. It would be useful for checking for things
like valid user input with explicit calls, rather than implicit type
checking.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
