OpenEuphoria

Re: Another namespace addition for 4.0?

• Posted by Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at ?o?gar.com> Apr 25, 2008
• 637 views

yuku wrote:
> 
> CChris wrote:
> > This looks like a crude definition of a package. I'm 100% for it, have it
> > implemented
> > in � and there has been much discussion last year about it...
> 
> My 1e-2 cents:
> 
> I hate looking at ":" for the namespace specifier.
> It looks unclean (not easily distinguisable from a letter), 
> hard to type, and not common. "_" is much cleaner...
> 
> Any reason why didn't we use . instead of : ?

Not to get picky, but . is easier to look at, distinguish and type. I've had
problems with my hands in the past and it's due mainly to the pinky reaching for
the shift key. However, I have gotten over that, I use a foot pedal now and a
true split keyboard (1/2's are separated by about 5 inches). The foot pedal works
Alt, Ctrl and Shift.

But, something to think about.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com