Re: datetime functions
- Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at ag?iculture.gouv?fr> Apr 25, 2008
- 618 views
yuku wrote: > > Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > > > > Pete Stoner wrote: > > > > > > > > The general difference between the Database set of commands and all the > > > others > > > is that they are just that, a set of related commands, so the prefix makes > > > sense. > > > > Pete, you have a very good point. Also, task has a prefix, I forgot about > > that. > > Maybe the simplest and correct solution to both my problems is to prefix > > with > > dt_ as you have suggested. > > > For me, I prefer no prefix IF the new namespace design in 3.2 really solves > the > namespace problem. The obstacle now is that I cannot build 3.2 due to some > errors > that I mentioned in the "3.2/4.0 build" subject. > > I am quite sure majority of the people here do not or cannot build the > exe from the source. It is very unclear how to build it correctly. > > Therefore, can someone help build it and upload it (maybe to the Recent User > Contribution page) > so that we ALL can try the new namespace design and also > {peek,poke}{2*,_string} > functions. Did you check EuForum prior about these compile errors? Look for "matherr", I'm sure it came up in the compile errors. Then you'll find out that the compile flags need -dEOW added so that OpenWatcom v1.x can compile quietly. RDS still uses 10.6, so the makefile doesn't contain this flag. CChris