Re: datetime functions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

yuku wrote:
> 
> Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> > 
> > Pete Stoner wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> > > The general difference between the Database set of commands and all the
> > > others
> > > is that they are just that, a set of related commands, so the prefix makes
> > > sense.
> > 
> > Pete, you have a very good point. Also, task has a prefix, I forgot about
> > that.
> > Maybe the simplest and correct solution to both my problems is to prefix
> > with
> > dt_ as you have suggested.
> 
> 
> For me, I prefer no prefix IF the new namespace design in 3.2 really solves
> the 
> namespace problem. The obstacle now is that I cannot build 3.2 due to some
> errors
> that I mentioned in the "3.2/4.0 build" subject. 
> 
> I am quite sure majority of the people here do not or cannot build the
> exe from the source. It is very unclear how to build it correctly.
> 
> Therefore, can someone help build it and upload it (maybe to the Recent User
> Contribution page)
> so that we ALL can try the new namespace design and also
> {peek,poke}{2*,_string}
> functions.

Did you check EuForum prior about these compile errors?
Look for "matherr", I'm sure it came up in the compile errors. Then you'll find
out that the compile flags need -dEOW added so that OpenWatcom v1.x can compile
quietly.
RDS still uses 10.6, so the makefile doesn't contain this flag.

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu