Re: datetime functions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> 
> Pete Stoner wrote:
> > 
> 
> > The general difference between the Database set of commands and all the
> > others
> > is that they are just that, a set of related commands, so the prefix makes
> > sense.
> 
> Pete, you have a very good point. Also, task has a prefix, I forgot about
> that.
> Maybe the simplest and correct solution to both my problems is to prefix with
> dt_ as you have suggested.


For me, I prefer no prefix IF the new namespace design in 3.2 really solves the 
namespace problem. The obstacle now is that I cannot build 3.2 due to some
errors
that I mentioned in the "3.2/4.0 build" subject. 

I am quite sure majority of the people here do not or cannot build the
exe from the source. It is very unclear how to build it correctly.

Therefore, can someone help build it and upload it (maybe to the Recent User
Contribution page)
so that we ALL can try the new namespace design and also {peek,poke}{2*,_string}
functions.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu