Re: Documenting functions that rely on namespace?
- Posted by Mike777 <anon4321 at gm?i?.com> Apr 25, 2008
- 634 views
Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > > Ok, maybe they do not rely upon, but are easier understood by namespace. > Here's > what I am speaking of... > > }}} <eucode> > include datetime.e as d > include map.e as m > > datetime d1 > map m1 > > d1 = d:new(2008, 10, 20, 12, 30, 0) > m1 = m:new() > </eucode> {{{ > > So, we have 2 new functions. How do I go about documenting that? EU has a fairly well defined method of documentation at the moment. There are essentially two distinct placements. The first is the documentation that can be found at http://www.rapideuphoria.com/refman.htm. Part I is the Core Language Part II are the built in Library routines (http://www.rapideuphoria.com/library.htm) Other libraries have their own documentation in a specific format that I assume you are familiar with. See win32Lib for example. Why wouldn't the standard library not just be documented as win32Lib is? Mike