Re: LISP-like expressions
- Posted by "Mike Nelson" <MichaelANelson at worldnet.att.net> Mar 04, 2004
- 661 views
> > I've noticed that there is a striking similarity between Lisp and > Euphoria: Lists and sequences are almost exactly the same thing. > > The only things that Euphoria lacks in order for it to actually by > definition *be* Lisp is functions as first-class objects (meaning, > essentially, that an actual function object can be returned as the > *result* of another function) and the use of the same sequence notation > as standard syntax for everything. > > I just find this really interesting, and wonder if perhaps coupled with > Diamond or a similar object system, Euphoria could in fact have some of > the extra benefits of Lisp. > I'd need to study more Lisp to see if I could implement all of what you are discussing. I'm confident that I could provide function objects as part of the Diamond Standard Class Library or as part of the Diamond kernel. I will look into this possiblity after I complete the 4.0 release. -- Mike Nelson