Re: graphics.e

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Robert McDougal wrote
>Curious about GRAPHICS.E.  It calls MACHINE_PROC or something like
>that for everything.  Since the underlying code for these functions
>is already embedded in the Euphoria interpreter, wouldn't it be more
>efficient to just have it directly support the various graphics
>statements.  Wouldn't the extra time processing strings instead of a
>number be made up for by not having to search through the procedure
>list or whatever?

You must have an old version of graphics.e, the new one certainly does not
call MACHINE_PROC for everything.

Einar Mogen

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu