RE: bignum progress report
- Posted by Bernie Ryan <xotron at bluefrognet.net> Oct 29, 2002
- 375 views
Christian.CUVIER at agriculture.gouv.fr wrote: > Yes, I know, but I'm not sure how the 16-bit thing will be handled by > Linux/Win32. It was reasonably optimized for my 386/33 (I didn't releae > this at the time), probably not adequate now. Further, it extensively > uses direct stack manipulation; I wouldn't try this in ring 3 app's... > How can I get an address for an Euphoria variable inside an ASM routine > I call()? Ok, I know, I can first poke() whatever data I need and call() > the code following this data. Isn't there a better way? > > Have a nice day! > Chris: You can use 16 bit or 32 bit (which would be easier and faster ) assembly code. Once you have saved your registers you can do anything you want; setup your own stack, etc. Bernie