RE: 2.4 alpha-test release
You are correct... I believe the only problem I have is dealing with
callbacks. However, if I find a problem with something other than
callbacks then I'll let you know. Most likely I'll just wait to alpha
test the new interpreter.
Thanks much,
-- Brian
Robert Craig wrote:
> Brian Broker writes:
> > Will 2.4 have native support for CDecl DLLs?
>
> Yes. I've been working on this lately.
> After much study of assembly code,
> and a lot of testing, I've confirmed that the
> interpreter (built by Watcom),
> and the translator using Watcom,
> can *already* call both stdcall and cdecl dlls.
> Do you have any counter examples?
>
> I've added cdecl support for Borland and Lcc.
> You just have to add a '+' to the function name
> in define_c_func/proc to indicate that it uses
> the cdecl calling convention.
>
> I also plan to allow Euphoria cdecl callback routines.
> Currently, callbacks are stdcall.
>
> By the way, Watcom does not exactly agree with
> the rest of the world as to the cdecl convention,
> but that won't affect us unless your dll is built using Watcom.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Craig
> Rapid Deployment Software
> http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
