RE: Acknowledgement

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

To Mr Craig:

> and you were worried that you now have to place an
> acknowledgement in all *Euphoria* programs that
> you distribute. That's not the intention. By "programs", 
> I mean here any programs that you build using the C source code. 
> Programs that you or anyone else writes in Euphoria 
> do not require any acknowledgement of RDS.
> 
> I'll clarify that for the next release.

No clarification is needed.  I read it as you intended.  I think from 
the replies I recieved that I have the answer I was looking for.

To Pete (with further clarification):

Having been programming as long as I have, I have used (and seen) just 
about everything that can be imagined.  I have tested (and created) 
numerious softwares and ActiveX controls.  I would say that up until 
now, 90% of the controls / packages I have tested and used are the exact 
opposite of what this agreement entails.  Which is not a bad thing.  I 
am so used to using free trial software with nag screens, delays, etc 
that, if you purchase the source code, may be modified freely because 
you now own the rights to the code, that his agreement threw me for a 
loop.  I was just making sure that this was simply not a typographical 
error.  It is obvious from both replys that it was not.  Like I said 
this is not a bad thing, just wanted to get a clarification on this.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu