Re: Acknowledgement

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:29:30 +0000, Don Phillips <EuNexus at yahoo.com>
wrote:

>I am not trying to rock the boat or anything, I just dont understand=20
>where the difference lies.  It seems passing funny to me that if I use=20
>the free version, no acknowledgement required, but if I *pay* for it, it=
 >is.

My $0.02: work created with free version: no ack.
		work created with normal reg'd version: no ack:
		work based on source & extending Rob's work: ack rqd.

Fair & proper, I think. Why exactly are you complaining/questioning
this?

Pete

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu