Re: procedures calling procedure calling procedure...
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Oct 14, 2002
- 377 views
Sorry but there isn't. RDS believes this is the best way to do it. I strongly disagree with RDS on that issue. The RDS philosophy seems to be that good programming practice is to only refer to things that have already been "seen" by the one-pass interpreter. Thus you cannot refer to any identifier that is defined lower down in the file. So yes, the physical layout of indentifier definitions in a source code file has been deemed to be vitally significant by RDS. This means that you as a programmer have to invent cunning ways to get around this limitation in the language (as implemented by RDS). Of course, RDS has also recognised that there are legitimate reasons for coders to do this, so Euphoria has been provided with routine_id(), call_proc/func() routines. My suspicions are that it is now too hard for RDS to change the way the interpreter works to allow for forward referencing, so we are stuck with this limitation for now. Whenever I get a spare 12-months, I'll write a new implementation of the interpreter ------------- Derek. 15/10/2002 7:21:59 AM, rubis at fem.unicamp.br wrote: > >Hi people ! > >How do I call a procedure that is after the call ? > >for example: > >--begin >procedure a() >?1 >end procedure > >procedure b() >a() >c() >end procedure > >procedure c() >?3 >end procedure > >--end > >I'm doing this using call_proc(c(), {}), but something tells me that there >is a more easy or intellignet way to do this... > >thanks >Rubens > > > > --------- Cheers, Derek Parnell ICQ# 7647806