OpenEuphoria

Re: Next version number 3.2 or 4.0?

• Posted by Jerry Story <story.jerry at gmail.??m> Apr 23, 2008
• 628 views

ChrisBurch2 wrote:
> 
> Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> > 
> > Kenneth Rhodes wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Why not port eFTE to Euphoria? 
> > > 
> > > Basically, Robert Craig's claim is that
> > > it would take much more [C] code to provide the same functionality as
> > > ed.ex.
> > > 
> > > Which language is eFTE coded in?  If not Euphoria, then why not?
> > > 
> > 
> > That would create a very nice editor (IMHO), however, it's 59k lines of
> > C/C++.
> > Not a trivial task.
> > 
> > --
> > Jeremy Cowgar
> > <a href="http://jeremy.cowgar.com">http://jeremy.cowgar.com</a>
> 
> Hi
> 
> Look at David Cuny's (and Irv Mullins') ee in the archives.
> 
> Chris

If you all are looking for an editor for Euphoria programming for GNU/Linux,
Kate is very good. It has syntax coloring for Euphoria (thanks to Irv Mullins).
It has sessions. You can quickly switch to another session (=project). It has a
built-in terminal that you can run programs in. It has a filesystem browser and a
list of documents. The list of documents changes when you change to a different
session. It has as many windows as you want. You can configure it every
imaginable way. It has syntax coloring for dozens of languages.

Kate is a KDE thing but it works on Gnome. But if you are running Gnome and you
want Kate to work fully and without bugs, you may need to install some KDE stuff.
For example the built-in terminal (very useful) won't work unless you install the
KDE version of terminal.