Re: Why not declare?
- Posted by Irv Mullins <mountains at MINDSPRING.COM> Jan 28, 1998
- 645 views
At 12:25 AM 1/28/98 -0500, you wrote: >Matt Williams writes: >> Why not just have a DECLARE keyword or >> something that lets you declare all >> procedures, functions, and types that will be used later. > Borland's pascal uses the FORWARD directive to pre-define procs/functions, handy if you really need it, but see below. >I also feel there is some benefit in the >language forcing you to order your >routines in some way. I think it helps >with maintenance and understanding, >especially of other people's code. Right! If I am going to wade through a mess of spaghetti, I want it to be the kind with meat sauce, thank you. Besides, forward declarations surely must add some overhead, maybe slow down the works a little ? Irv ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ visit my Euphoria archives: http://www.mindspring.com/~mountains ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------