Re: Matheval ... the next step (for me)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Mike777 wrote:
> 
> OK, my problem was that I was using the internal formatting, which is
> {OP,VAR1,VAR2}
> where VAR1 = {DATA or CONSTANT, ARG1, ARG2} syntax.  The correct syntax is the
> simple, it should work that way but somehow I didn't think it did, way, which
> is:
> 
> VAL(x).

Yeah, the {OP,VAR1,VAR2} syntax is for creating matheval sequences in code.
Anything you pass to the parser should be simpler and easier to read, and
generally read like you'd expect an equation or whatever to look like.

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu