Re: Matheval ... the next step (for me)
- Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at g?ail?com> Apr 23, 2008
- 615 views
Mike777 wrote: > > OK, my problem was that I was using the internal formatting, which is > {OP,VAR1,VAR2} > where VAR1 = {DATA or CONSTANT, ARG1, ARG2} syntax. The correct syntax is the > simple, it should work that way but somehow I didn't think it did, way, which > is: > > VAL(x). Yeah, the {OP,VAR1,VAR2} syntax is for creating matheval sequences in code. Anything you pass to the parser should be simpler and easier to read, and generally read like you'd expect an equation or whatever to look like. Matt