RE: atoms, grrrrrr
Kat,
What I usually do in a case like this is either trace it or just put the
following before the test:
? at1
? s1
if at1 < length( s1 ) then...
That should provide enough insight to solve your problem.
-- Brian
Kat wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2001, at 11:49, Euman wrote:
>
> > You never assigned a value to at1 before you
> > asked it whether it was less than another value
>
> Peoples, i did provide the values, as printed out in ex.err, they had
> values.
>
> On 21 Feb 2001, at 13:40, Ted Fines wrote:
>
> > The following code works, and should output a 5 and then a 3, if the
> > variables are left unchanged. misc.e is included for the sleep()
> > function.
> >
> > length(s) gets evaluated twice in the code and both times works. Even
> > if
> > you set s="", it still functions properly.
> >
> > If I were you, I'd add these four lines before my comparison of the
> > integer
> > and length(s)...
> > puts(1,sprintf("%d\n",length(s)))
> > for c=1 to length(s) do
> > puts(1,"s[" & sprintf("%d",c) & "]=" & s[c] & "\n")
> > end for
> > ...just so you can see if s is what you think it is.
>
> And it is what i thought it is, as i assigned them and as printed out in
> ex.err.
>
> On 21 Feb 2001, at 11:49, Brian Broker wrote:
>
> > Kat,
> >
> > You have not provided enough info... Perhaps you could send a snippet
> > of actual code that produces the same error. The following program
> > works great:
>
> I did, it's:
>
> if at1 < length( s1 )
>
> > sequence s1
> > integer at1
> >
> > -- first define at1, and s1
> > at1 = 3
> > -- data:
> > --s1={116't',104'h',101'e'},{99'c',97'a',116't'}{97'a',116't',101'e'},
> > --{98'b',105'i',103'g'},{100'd',105'i',110'n',110'n',101'e',114'r'}}
> > s1 = { "the", "cat", "ate", "big", "dinner" }
>
> That is how i defined it, the line just above is what ex.err printed
> out, which is the
> same thing and correct, right?
>
> >
> > if at1 < length( s1 ) then
> > puts( 1, "at1 < length(s1)" )
> > else
> > puts( 1, "at1 > length(s1)" )
> > end if
>
> So why is the code you wrote, which is exactly the code i put into this
> other program,
> working by itself, and not in the program? The boolean test line is the
> same, and the
> vars are the same.
>
> Kat
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|