Re: atoms, grrrrrr
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Feb 21, 2001
- 395 views
On 21 Feb 2001, at 11:49, Euman wrote: > You never assigned a value to at1 before you > asked it whether it was less than another value Peoples, i did provide the values, as printed out in ex.err, they had values. On 21 Feb 2001, at 13:40, Ted Fines wrote: > The following code works, and should output a 5 and then a 3, if the > variables are left unchanged. misc.e is included for the sleep() function. > > length(s) gets evaluated twice in the code and both times works. Even if > you set s="", it still functions properly. > > If I were you, I'd add these four lines before my comparison of the integer > and length(s)... > puts(1,sprintf("%d\n",length(s))) > for c=1 to length(s) do > puts(1,"s[" & sprintf("%d",c) & "]=" & s[c] & "\n") > end for > ...just so you can see if s is what you think it is. And it is what i thought it is, as i assigned them and as printed out in ex.err. On 21 Feb 2001, at 11:49, Brian Broker wrote: > Kat, > > You have not provided enough info... Perhaps you could send a snippet > of actual code that produces the same error. The following program > works great: I did, it's: if at1 < length( s1 ) > sequence s1 > integer at1 > > -- first define at1, and s1 > at1 = 3 > -- data: > --s1={116't',104'h',101'e'},{99'c',97'a',116't'}{97'a',116't',101'e'}, > --{98'b',105'i',103'g'},{100'd',105'i',110'n',110'n',101'e',114'r'}} > s1 = { "the", "cat", "ate", "big", "dinner" } That is how i defined it, the line just above is what ex.err printed out, which is the same thing and correct, right? > > if at1 < length( s1 ) then > puts( 1, "at1 < length(s1)" ) > else > puts( 1, "at1 > length(s1)" ) > end if So why is the code you wrote, which is exactly the code i put into this other program, working by itself, and not in the program? The boolean test line is the same, and the vars are the same. Kat