Re: Standard library - date and time
- Posted by yuku <yuku at ik?tek.?om> Apr 22, 2008
- 1068 views
Jeremy Cowgar wrote: > I think we need to decide. Do we want to have 3 types representing dates and > times? date, time and datetime ? I strongly vote for only one type: datetime. Reasons: - this is Euphoria (simple!) not perl or some other complicated languages - why would someone use time type? It is just a bunch of seconds grouped in 60 and 60*60. No difficult math there. - even Java only have Date (which is date + time), no Time or specific Date - having date type does not speed calculation, only difference with datetime is there is no need to multiply with 86400 - we don't need to break existing codes by using "date" and "time" for type names or function names (important!)