Re: plans, ideas and RETT
>
>It seems you are more highly insulted by the dribble coming from Rett than
you are of that coming from MTS. If you pel-smack at Rett for what he said,
why do you keep your mouth shut to MTS? he seems to have pissed off many
more people than Rett. (Although i was not on this list when he decided to
not post, so im not 100% sure about that)
>
>Im not defending Rett or condeming MTS or you Graeme, im just trying to say
you sound a little one sided on this subject when there is no good reason
for it. (or at least no good reason that i can see). Please dont take
offence to this message, it was not meant to be the least bit offending
>
>--
>evil, corruption and bad taste
>cEnsE
You need to catch up on your reading.
I have sent a couple in Mike's direction also,
however I don't indulge in on-going flame wars.
MTS is obviously only encouraged by flames.
If we were to reply to each ridiculous post that was
sent to this list (by whoever) it would be even more
full of rubbish than it already is. My policy is to
say my piece and then butt out.
Another point is that despite my intense dislike of
Mike's disregard for any sort of social etiquette,
which I have notified him of both publicly and privately,
he does _occasionally_ contribute the odd useful bit of
code.
(crikey, was I just sticking up for MTS then? - it's
a strange, strange world 
Graeme
(butting out)
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
