Re: Standard library - date and time

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

c.k.lester wrote:
> 
> I don't think I'd have a problem with any of these changes if there were
> increases in speed and ease-of-use/utility. You would probably need to
> emulate the old date() and time() functions (in something like old_date() and
> old_time()) so dependent code could be easily modified.

I wouldn't get rid of the current date() function. This would just be in
addition to the date() function.

--
Jeremy Cowgar
http://jeremy.cowgar.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu