OpenEuphoria

Re: Win32Lib bug?

• Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at prodigy.net> Nov 16, 2000
• 472 views

Brian,

Well, I think it is a bug, but it may be intended as feature?  :)

And I think there is supposed to be a new command to re-set the style of a
window, (Wolf says Derek mentioned them in a post earlier, & I think I do
remember that, now), addStyle() and removeStyle(), but I couldn't find them,
maybe they are upcoming;  the best I could do was to hack Win32Lib as
follows:

in "procedure createWindow",
after "if flags!=0 then"
find "lFlags=or_bits(flags,lFlags)",
and change it to:
"lFlags= flags --or_bits(flags,lFlags)";

that will allow whatever *you* set as flags to be accepted and created,
without regard for the default setting (which is what I *think* lFlags is or
was), that is, without "or'ing" the default with the user specified
styles(which amounts to adding all the styles together).  However, I have
*no* idea if this will make other problems or not!!

Maybe there's a better way, but that's all I could find.  Hopefully Derek
will CHANGE THIS BACK, so the programmer can specify window styles easily??

Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Broker" <bkb at CNW.COM>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Win32Lib bug?


> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:40:25 -0800, Dan B Moyer wrote:
>
> >Brian,
> >
> >This is the same kind of thing I was referring to in an earlier post!
Glad
> >someone else noticed it too. :)
> >
> >I said:
> >
> >"One possible problem to look out for with regard to style setting for
> >windows, unless Derek has changed it in Win32Lib, is that as far as I
> >understand, in (a) recent version, the default style setting does *not*
get
> >"over-ridden" by user specified style, the user spec just gets *added* to
> >the default, so you can't be completely sure that you have "rolled your
> >own" (window style) as you intended."
>
> Dan,
>
> Sorry I missed that post, but thanks for bringing it up again.  But my
> question still stands:  Is this a bug or a feature?  If this is a feature,
> then how should I go about making a non-sizeable window?
>
> -- Brian