OpenEuphoria

Re: Compilers for translation

• Posted by Derek Parnell <dparnell at BIGPOND.NET.AU> Nov 07, 2000
• 446 views

The main problem with Visual C++ is that it's expensive whereas the other's
are free.

------
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
(Vote [1] The Cheshire Cat for Internet Mascot)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Skoda" <tone.skoda at SIOL.NET>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Compilers for translation


> >From: Robert Craig <rds at ATTCANADA.NET>
>
>
> > Asif Baloch writes:
> > > Just wanted to know if Visual C++ can be used to
> > > compile the translated .c code from .ex ?
> >
> > Currently no. Maybe in the future.
> >
>
>
> I vote for Visual C++. Because I have it. And I assume it produces the
> fastest code, as Mike the Spike once wrote. I kinda believe him, because
> Quake was written with it. After all, isn't all about speed? :) (and dlls)