Re: Py 2.5g Update
- Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at PRODIGY.NET> Nov 03, 2000
- 452 views
Kat, Nope, haven't the *foggiest*! Maybe David can tell us. But since, as I understand it, Ox is a "grammar generator", maybe "lexer" is a "lexicographical error"? Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 5:38 PM Subject: Re: Py 2.5g Update > Dan, can you tell me what "lexer" is? It's not in any of my dictionaries. > > Kat > > On 3 Nov 2000, at 16:28, Dan B Moyer wrote: > > > David, > > > > But does your spell checker know how to spell "separate" ?? :) Took *me* a > > while to figure out how to remind myself how to spell it correctly: there's > > *a rat* in "separate". > > > > Dan > > (who can't program 1/100 as well as David can spell!) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Cuny, David at DSS" <David.Cuny at DSS.CA.GOV> > > To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> > > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:04 PM > > Subject: Py 2.5g Update > > > > > > > That's right, yet another release at: > > > > > > http://www.lanset.com/dcuny/py.htm > > > > > > This version mainly adds checks on parameters, so it can recover nicely if > > > you pass a bad format string to printf, a negative value to sqrt, use a > > > sequence as loop index or conditional test, and so on. Thanks for Falkon > > for > > > catching most of these. > > > > > > I've also run a spell check on the documentation, because I've > > consistantly > > > proven I can't spell 'concatenation'. And I'll try to stop referring to > > > 'associative' lists as 'associated' lists. > > > > > > Finally, I fixed yet another lexer bug in Ox, so I'll be sending that as a > > > seperate update to Robert. > > > > > > As usual, feedback is appreciated! > > > > > > -- David Cuny > >