Re: Coming From QBasic
- Posted by "Lynn Kilroy" <leks_transportation at hotmail.com> Jan 16, 2006
- 521 views
Does the Global function thingy have to be included in the main body of the= code, even if the function is in an included file? And how about the subroutines? How do I call them? Love & Friendship & Blessed Be! Lynn Erika Kilroy >From: "D. Newhall" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> >Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com >To: EUforum at topica.com >Subject: Re: Coming From QBasic >Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:34:21 -0800 > > >posted by: D. Newhall <derek_newhall at yahoo.com> > >Lynn Kilroy wrote: > > > > My biggest curiousity is how do I get it to use subs in Included files?= > > I type the include file line. It accepts that fine. Then I try to get= > > it to do the screen mode thing, and that it doesn't seem to do so well.= > > Also, if it's a one-line sub, perhaps I can just plug the line in to my= > > code without the rest of the sub? One line subs only make sense to me > > if they are a sub that's called often and by many different routines, > > and I want it to look purdy instead of using the languages default > > command synstax. An example from QBasic is my Inkey routine. It's cal= l > > is purdy simple: >(snip) > >To move stuff between includes you need to declare it as global like so: > >global integer index > >global function do_stuff() > ... >end function > >it also has to be declared as such before you use it no matter which file= >it is in. > >However, there is no call-by-reference in Euphoria so certain things like= >the inkey example will not work (I think my QB is rusty). Stuff like "Inpu= t >ans$" would be used in Euphoria as "ans = input()". > >There's also a QBasic to Euphoria translator in the Archive. >=20=20 >http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=o= n&gen=on&keywords=qbasic > > > > Speaking of Screen Modes, one of my programs uses a Screen Mode about > > which I can find no information in Euphoria Documentation available to > > me. I use the QBASIC command >(snip) > >Check the documnetation on graphics ans sound and the graphics.e include= >file. I think the routines you want are graphics_mode() and/or >video_config(). > > > Basically, what I'm looking for is something with the flexibility and > > ease of use of QBasic but for more modern programming environments. > > Euphoria looks like it might be able to fill the bill, but first, I hav= e > > to understand the very basic differences between it and QB. I don't > > mean the technical stuff like variable groups and nests and stuff {all > > that's kind of neat, though, and part of my attraction to the language}= , > > but the basic syntax and use of the language, and perhaps help in > > handling graphics with the simplicity of QB, but without all the bugger= y > > errors. > >Euphoria is certainly a good replacement (I use in place of all the stuff = I >used QBasic for both professionally and privately). However, certain thing= s >aren't as easy but in the long run are more powerful and flexible (I >think). Also, Euphoria is constantly improved and MUCH faster than QBasic= >(the Euphoria interpreter beats some compiled QBasic programs). > > > > Another thing ... I have a QB Compiler. From what I saw in the > > documentations, there is no Euphoria Compiler. This is something of a > > drawback to me. I can purchase a Euphoria binder program, I can even > > purchase a Euphoria to C translater. But no Euphoria direct to > > Executable Compiler. I imagine this is not a problem with Linux, but > > with Windows, it becomes a problem that is really quite large. From > > what I can see, there are no free c compilers for Windows. This means > > that no matter the cost of the binder and translator, the overall cost > > of Euphoria for the programmer is still prohibitively expensive. Sure,= > > QB is old, and yes, it's very limited. But at least I can distribute m= y > > QBasic Programs in such a format that people don't have to download a Q= B > > interpreter to use them, or, worse, purchase a $500.00 program in order= > > to compile it and use it. Nor do I have to risk the uncredited theft m= y > > source code {which I make available under GPL, but still, the compiled > > version preserves my status as original author on the original code}. > >There is a free version of the C translator that has a notice saying it's= >unregistered that you could use. Also, there are free Windows C compilers.= >Open Watcom (http://www.openwatcom.org) is one which I highly recommend. > > >The Euphoria Standard Library project : > http://esl.sourceforge.net/ >The Euphoria Standard Library mailing list : > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/esl-discussion > > > >