Vincent, please read. (was Re: Why some ...+ FASTER PARSING than 2.4 !)
- Posted by D. Newhall <derek_newhall at yahoo.com> Jan 03, 2006
- 630 views
Vincent wrote: > > Before you get to excited, lets face it... RDS is *not* going to change the > way Euphoria parses. We might get an additional small speed improvement in the > next release, but in general, Euphoria won't ever parse quickly again on older > systems. *sigh* This is getting old. How do you know Vincent? You always do this. You always claim that RDS won't ever do something or must do something to survive. It is never like "RDS should do this to boost sales", oh no, it's "there is no future for Euphoria without feature X". Yes, in many cases that would be a nice feature but will it cause Euphoria to die? Probably not, and even then you have no idea if it will or not unless you secretly have some time machine you built in your garage and have seen the Euphoria-less future. Or perhaps you are clairvoyant and can see into the limitless future. In regards to statments such as the above, again, how do you know? Are you secretly psychicly linked to Rob's mind? For all we know Rob will find some bug in the fontend that will speed up execution by 50% or maybe he reads some paper on multi-threaded parsing or he reimplements the frontend in C. You have no idea if he will or not so stop speaking for RDS. Will this happen? Probably not, but again you have no idea. Now, do I think Rob should do more with the language? Of course I think he should, there's so much room for improvement in the language (I've actually measured how much a foreach statement would speed up my coding and it'd be around a 10% increase in code output for what I do). Now the keyword there is "think", it is my opinion not objective fact as many of your statements seem to try to make themselves sound as if they are. Do I overly criticize Rob for not implementing some feature I think is "necessary" (such as being a .NET language or multi-threading)? Of course not. I'm not saying you can't voice your opinion I just think your overly absolutist criticism is unnecessary and quite possibly inaccurate. This is not meant as hostile criticism of you or your opinions it's just that this seems to be quite common coming from you and it really serves no purpose and can be quite annoying to us that read the forum regularly. The Euphoria Standard Library project : http://esl.sourceforge.net/ The Euphoria Standard Library mailing list : https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/esl-discussion