Re: Re[4]: Why some people have not upgraded
- Posted by D. Newhall <derek_newhall at yahoo.com> Jan 03, 2006
- 447 views
akusaya wrote: > > >> Could it be something 'big' like ignoring function results? :D > p> No disrespect intended, aku, but that does blow my mind that you think > p> that 'big'. It just seems so tiny against the include file problems and > p> non-blocking i/o... > > Yes, I also think that ignoring function results is a tiny thing, but > I consider it as 'big' when seen from RDS point of view, because I > think RDS is always busy implementing difficult things but not the most > simple things... > (snip) Well, in this case RDS probably won't implement it because it's a bad idea. A function returns a value so, naturally, if I forget to catch this value I'll be trying to make it do somthing it shouldn't be doing and isn't permitted in the language so I would of course expect an error to occur. The Euphoria Standard Library project : http://esl.sourceforge.net/ The Euphoria Standard Library mailing list : https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/esl-discussion