OpenEuphoria

Re: Re: Visual Euphoria wont run

• Posted by "William Heimbigner" <icxcnika at hotpop.com> Sep 23, 2004
• 437 views

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <michellerogers at bellsouth.net>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>; <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Visual Euphoria wont run ATT:Matt Lewis


>
>
>  You guys aren't understanding my question........
> I meant, what would be the reason for posting closed source, as opposed to
open source.  The reasons that both you and ck gave do not say why it should
be closed source and not open.
>
So that other people wont rip off your ideas.

A: Because its very difficult to read and understand
Q: Why?
A: Top Posting
Q: What's REALLY annoying in email and newsgroups?


> Michelle
>
> > From: spent memory <spent.memory at gmail.com>
> > Date: 2004/09/23 Thu PM 12:51:33 EDT
> > To: EUforum at topica.com
> > Subject: Re: Re: Visual Euphoria wont run ATT:Matt Lewis
> >
> >
> > to benefit the users , in my case they obtain a tool for writing
euphoria code
> > very quickly, a standard window in about 10 seconds if your slow!!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:45:53 -0400, michellerogers at bellsouth.net
> > <michellerogers at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > What would be the reason for contributing closed source to the
archieves?
> > >
> > > Michelle
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: cklester <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
> > > > Date: 2004/09/23 Thu PM 12:43:44 EDT
> > > > To: EUforum at topica.com
> > > > Subject: Re: Re: Visual Euphoria wont run ATT:Matt Lewis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> > > >
> > > > <michellerogers at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I thought the archieves existed for people to learn how to use
Euphoria.
> > > >
> > > > Well, I hope you know better, now. :)
> > > >
> > > > If not, it exists to feature code and programs written in Euphoria.
Yes,
> > > > you can learn better from the open source code... but you can also
make
> > > > use of closed-source programs.
> > > >
> > > > > I know that's what I used it for.
> > > >
> > > > And others use it for other reasons. I get code from the archives
even
> > > > today, but I'm certainly not using all of it to learn Euphoria.
> > > >
> > > > > And, if the programs hadn't been open source (the ones that I
> > > > > used), I wouldn't be still using Euphoria today.
> > > >
> > > > There will always be open-source contributions. That shouldn't
hinder
> > > > those who want to contribute closed-source shareware.
> > > >
> > > > Even Euphoria itself is closed-source and shareware (by which I
mean,
> > > > not fully functional without a registration or fee)!!!
> > > >
> > > > -=ck
> > > > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> > > > http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>