Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions
- Posted by spent memory <spent.memory at gmail.com> Sep 23, 2004
- 473 views
specially when u just turned 23 :/ On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:56 +1000, spent memory <spent.memory at gmail.com> wrote: > nice critique unkmar, phsycoanalysis is a field best left to phsycologists > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:20:02 -0400, Lucius Hilley > <l3euphoria at bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > David was very early and I believe his items are open. > > Judith appeared much later but not late enough that the number of > > euphorians and the number of years of closed contributions had > > reached the apparent critical mass that your contribution has reached. > > in other words. Bad timing. If you had waited a few months it > > would have been someone other than you. > > > > You shouldn't be taking it personal. Of course, You are going to > > anyway, because you are new and you want it. It is all about > > me. me me me. All about me. I am the only one that exists or > > matters. So if anyone says anything that can be anywhere close to > > being assumed as attack on poor little ole me then. Me Me me > > don't attack Me. It's all about me. I think I get my point across now. > > > > I grew older and met adults. They are just older children. > > Most are still very self-centered. > > > > unkmar > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "spent memory" <spent.memory at gmail.com> > > To: <EUforum at topica.com> > > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:08 AM > > Subject: Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions > > > > > > > > the whole purpose of the release of VE was to benefit people who don't > > > want to type the same code over and over, not to start a open source > > > vs compiled code debate. i wonder if david cuny, and judith experienced > > > this sort of backlash when trying to release a beneficial tool into > > > the euphoria > > > community > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:00:03 -0700, cklester <guest at rapideuphoria.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com> > > > > > > > > Unkmar wrote: > > > > > > > > > THOSE ARE PRODUCTS NOT CONTRIBUTIONS > > > > > > > > A contribution CAN be a closed-source program! There's nothing about the > > > > word "contribution" that indicates "open source" or "free." > > > > > > > > It's a "program archive," not a "code donation archive." > > > > > > > > -=ck > > > > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA." > > > > http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >