Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

specially when u just turned 23 :/


On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:56 +1000, spent memory <spent.memory at gmail.com>
wrote:
> nice critique unkmar, phsycoanalysis is a field best left to phsycologists
> 
> 
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:20:02 -0400, Lucius Hilley
> <l3euphoria at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> > David was very early and I believe his items are open.
> > Judith appeared much later but not late enough that the number of
> > euphorians and the number of years of closed contributions had
> > reached the apparent critical mass that your contribution has reached.
> > in other words.  Bad timing.  If you had waited a few months it
> > would have been someone other than you.
> >
> > You shouldn't be taking it personal.  Of course, You are going to
> > anyway, because you are new and you want it.  It is all about
> > me.  me me me. All about me.  I am the only one that exists or
> > matters. So if anyone says anything that can be anywhere close to
> > being assumed as attack on poor little ole me then.  Me Me me
> > don't attack Me.  It's all about me.  I think I get my point across now.
> >
> > I grew older and met adults. They are just older children.
> > Most are still very self-centered.
> >
> >    unkmar
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "spent memory" <spent.memory at gmail.com>
> > To: <EUforum at topica.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:08 AM
> > Subject: Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions
> >
> > >
> > > the whole purpose of the release of VE was to benefit people who don't
> > > want to type the same code over and over, not to start a open source
> > > vs compiled code debate. i wonder if david cuny, and judith experienced
> > > this sort of backlash when trying to release a beneficial tool into
> > > the euphoria
> > > community
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:00:03 -0700, cklester <guest at rapideuphoria.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> > > >
> > > > Unkmar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > THOSE ARE PRODUCTS NOT CONTRIBUTIONS
> > > >
> > > > A contribution CAN be a closed-source program! There's nothing about the
> > > > word "contribution" that indicates "open source" or "free."
> > > >
> > > > It's a "program archive," not a "code donation archive."
> > > >
> > > > -=ck
> > > > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> > > > http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu