Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions
David was very early and I believe his items are open.
Judith appeared much later but not late enough that the number of
euphorians and the number of years of closed contributions had
reached the apparent critical mass that your contribution has reached.
in other words. Bad timing. If you had waited a few months it
would have been someone other than you.
You shouldn't be taking it personal. Of course, You are going to
anyway, because you are new and you want it. It is all about
me. me me me. All about me. I am the only one that exists or
matters. So if anyone says anything that can be anywhere close to
being assumed as attack on poor little ole me then. Me Me me
don't attack Me. It's all about me. I think I get my point across now.
I grew older and met adults. They are just older children.
Most are still very self-centered.
unkmar
----- Original Message -----
From: "spent memory" <spent.memory at gmail.com>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions
>
>
> the whole purpose of the release of VE was to benefit people who don't
> want to type the same code over and over, not to start a open source
> vs compiled code debate. i wonder if david cuny, and judith experienced
> this sort of backlash when trying to release a beneficial tool into
> the euphoria
> community
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:00:03 -0700, cklester <guest at rapideuphoria.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> >
> > Unkmar wrote:
> >
> > > THOSE ARE PRODUCTS NOT CONTRIBUTIONS
> >
> > A contribution CAN be a closed-source program! There's nothing about the
> > word "contribution" that indicates "open source" or "free."
> >
> > It's a "program archive," not a "code donation archive."
> >
> > -=ck
> > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> > http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
