OpenEuphoria

Re: request to ban 'no source' contributions

• Posted by spent memory <spent.memory at gmail.com> Sep 23, 2004
• 475 views

the whole purpose of the release of VE was to benefit people who don't
want to type the same code over and over, not to start a open source
vs compiled code debate. i wonder if david cuny, and judith experienced
this sort of backlash when trying to release a beneficial tool into
the euphoria
community


On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:00:03 -0700, cklester <guest at rapideuphoria.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> 
> Unkmar wrote:
> 
> > THOSE ARE PRODUCTS NOT CONTRIBUTIONS
> 
> A contribution CAN be a closed-source program! There's nothing about the
> word "contribution" that indicates "open source" or "free."
> 
> It's a "program archive," not a "code donation archive."
> 
> -=ck
> "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>