OpenEuphoria

Re: Eugtk 2 s paths

• Posted by "Elliott S. de Andrade" <quantum_analyst at hotmail.com> Sep 22, 2004
• 485 views

>From: irv mullins <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
>Reply-To: EUforum at topica.com
>To: EUforum at topica.com
>Subject: Re: Eugtk 2 s paths
>Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:43:00 -0700
>
>posted by: irv mullins <irvm at ellijay.com>
>
>Elliott S. de Andrade wrote:
>
>I think the reason people requested removal of the hard-coded prefix
>was because of problems with Windows.
>

  I don't see what the problem would be. Anyone care to explain? Perhaps it=
=20
is because Rob said the
/ working was just an anomaly of Windows. The interpreter would think file.=
e=20
and me/file.e were
different. I have nothing wrong with this, but Rob said it was only because=
=20
of the Windows "bug"
that me/file.e was opened. I know if he changed it, all he was going to do=
=20
was make the interpreter
think file.e and me/file.e were the same (but i don't think some well-verse=
d=20
people were approve).
So, maybe I brought this point up for nothing, or maybe I've explained it s=
o=20
well that those people
who didn't want the prefix won't mind it anymore, who knows...

>Irv
>

~[ WingZone ]~
http://wingzone.tripod.com/

=20
get-togethers.=20
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=10=
34&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines=20
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN=AE Premium right now and get the=
=20
first two months FREE*.