Re: Euphoria and Windows XP SP2

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Pete Lomax wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:07:26 -0700, Robert Craig
> <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> >In the new open source version of Euphoria written 100% in Euphoria,
> >I've taken the approach of having a fixed number (20) of 
> fine by me.
> >I could support "infinite" call-backs 
> >there too, but it's extra work, and people want me to hurry up smile
> You've piqued my interest on how you think you might do that.
> I'm only asking to learn, you understand.

I haven't worked out the details, but just as I manufacture
call-back machine code at run-time in the current (C-coded) 
interpreter, I could manufacture intermediate language (IL) 
for additional Euphoria routines, at run-time, in the 
Euphoria-coded interpreter. When you see the source in a 
few weeks, you'll understand better what I'm talking about.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu