OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria and Windows XP SP2

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Sep 18, 2004
• 418 views

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:43:15 -0700, Tommy Carlier
<guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:

>Like suggested in
>previous posts, the manually constructed assembly-routines
>cause problems. But there were also problems with c_func
I suspect the call_back function (line 199) is essentially the same.
Platform.htm states "each call-back address that you create requires a
small block of memory." At a guess that will be allocated on the heap
(so will be a data segment not a code segment) and will contain
machine code, not data (so it can be called).

Is there anything in DEP which permits a program to deliberately
change a data segment into a code segment, or is that fixed on initial
program load?

Pete
PS I too, have just acquired another computer - it has a whopping 16MB
of ram and runs at a staggering 133MHz )