Re: Euphoria needs more popularity!
On 16 Sep 2004, at 10:59, Jonas Temple wrote:
> Rob, from my perspective I have very little interest in the front-end
> of the interpreter or having a 100% Euphoria-based interpreter. What I
> need is a stable product that solves the problem at hand. My guess would
> be that I'm not alone on this...
I am very interested, mostly because splitting the execution unit from the
compiler and interpreter leads to all the features everyone has asked for,
including goto, string execution, pointers, Bernie's "hooks", case tables,
conditional type checking necessary for record types, importing C code,
calling other languages, etc.. It's probably to RDS's detriment that these
added features won't be part of Eu's core,,, partly for the value added to Eu's
income, and partly because it's likely differently enabled user versions won't
play nicely together.
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
