Re: Euphoria needs more popularity!
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Sep 16, 2004
- 500 views
Version 2.0 Official Release March 25, 1998 + 12 months Version 2.1 Official Release for WIN32 + DOS32 March 29, 1999 + 10 months Version 2.2 Official Release for WIN32+DOS32 January 14, 2000 + 25 months Version 2.3 Official Release February 11, 2002 + 18 months Version 2.4 Official Release July 3, 2003 + 18 months? Version 2.5 ?December, 2004? That's right, we have moved from v2.0 to v2.5 in 6.5 years. Not Fast. RDS is slow to release anything, and they keep declining offers of help. Could this be another reason for people being discouraged? Yes, I know there is a shitload of work to get out a new release, but there is also many able people to help, if only you'd let them. I would prefer a major release every 6 months with weekly minor (patch) releases, instead of this cold molasses. Perfection is not so nearly as important as improvement. Having a perfect product that doesn't meet my needs is not much use. Having a nearly perfect product that I can still use is a much better prospect. Robert, Are you using beta testers? Has anyone impartially inspected or reviewed your code? Do you have a formal(-ish) issue log that you are working through? Do you need more man-hours in the day to work on Euphoria? Sorry to sound so frustrated, but I am. I love Euphoria and I continue to champion it, but I also begin to tire. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia