Re: DOS32 only install. Where?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Kat wrote:

> > I gave up on the old DOS installer after 2.3.
> > It's too much trouble to build and test two different
> > install packages, just so the 1% of people still using
> > pre-Win95 machines won't have to copy the EUPHORIA 
> > directory from a newer machine.
> 
> That's silly! A plain zip file of Euphoria is too much?? Granted, to download 
> the file, they'd almost certainly have win3 or more, but some people still use
>
> a Commodore 64 to do web browsing!

Or Mac - whatever. By now, anyone who uses plain DOS will not be deterred 
by having to unzip some files and set up autoexec.bat. The DOS installer 
was never really necessary, just a nice touch. 

Irv

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu